The metaverse was never supposed to be a headset that shuts you off from reality. It was meant to be a layer that slips into it — quietly, usefully, and with consent. That distinction matters more now than ever, as large tech companies appear to step back from a future they once loudly announced.
Over the past weeks, my LinkedIn timeline has filled with familiar signals: budgets shifting, language softening, ambitions reframed. Meta seems to be easing off the accelerator. And after Microsoft already cooled its most visible mixed-reality efforts years ago, the narrative is quickly forming: the metaverse didn’t work.
I don’t buy that conclusion.
I still believe the metaverse is real — and still coming. Just not in the form it was marketed. And certainly not as VR-first escapism.
Trust Is the Foundation
The metaverse is, before anything else, a trust problem.
Presence, identity, continuity, memory — these aren’t rendering challenges. They are social contracts. If you ask people to live part of their lives in a digital layer, you are asking for an extraordinary level of confidence in who owns that layer, who observes it, and who governs it.
That is where Meta has always struggled.
Not because of a single scandal, but because of accumulation. The Facebook era left a long shadow, and those trust deficits don’t reset just because the hardware changes. You can’t ask users to hand over embodied presence before you’ve earned the right to host it.
Ironically, Meta itself has articulated this problem well. Its leadership has previously drawn parallels to early Microsoft — a company once seen as weak on security, which turned that weakness into a defining strength during its cloud transition. The analogy holds. If privacy had become Meta’s non-negotiable pillar, the entire metaverse conversation might have unfolded differently.
Without trust, immersion becomes intrusion.
The Barriers: Friction Still Wins
The second issue is friction — not philosophical, but physical.
The leap from everyday life into VR remains too large. Headsets are still something you put on, not something you forget you’re wearing. Even the lighter, more elegant experiments — like smart glasses — still announce themselves through boot sequences, pairing delays, and subtle moments of disconnection.
Those moments matter.
The winning interface is the one that disappears. That’s why glasses remain the correct form factor — not because they’re futuristic, but because they’re boring. Familiar. Socially acceptable.
We’ve already seen the spectrum emerge. Devices that allow you to dial reality up or down — from full immersion to pure pass-through — hint at where this is going. What matters is not maximum virtuality, but control over virtuality. The ability to stay fully here, gently augmented, or briefly elsewhere.
Until that control feels effortless, barriers will keep winning.
The Quiet Giant: Network Effects
Here’s the part that’s often missed.
The metaverse doesn’t rise or fall on hardware. It lives or dies on network effects.
Why don’t people leave WhatsApp? Not because it’s perfect, but because everyone else is there. Gravity beats features every time. Meta understands this better than almost anyone — it’s why Facebook bought Instagram, why ecosystems matter more than products.
When Horizon stalled, it wasn’t just a product failure. It was a network failure.
Now add AI to the equation.
AI changes the rules because it can simulate presence. Populate environments. Act as characters, collaborators, crowds. A world no longer needs millions of concurrent users to feel alive. Intelligence can scaffold experience long before scale arrives.
This is the blind spot in most metaverse debates. The next network effect won’t be purely human. It will be hybrid — part social graph, part intelligent infrastructure.
The Hidden Fourth: Space Compression
This is where the real killer app lives.
We talk about devices, trust, and networks — but the deeper driver is space.
We have too much stuff and too little room. Too many screens fighting for attention. TVs dominating walls, laptops crowding tables, phones shrinking experiences into pockets. Everyone wants something different, at the same time, in the same physical space.
The metaverse’s true value proposition isn’t escape — it’s space compression.
Infinite screens without physical clutter. Objects without storage. Personal environments layered over shared rooms. Gear you can afford virtually that you could never justify physically.
A €20,000 DJ setup becomes a €199 simulation. A cinema-sized screen appears without mounting brackets. Your environment adapts to your preferences — brightness, layout, style — without rearranging furniture or negotiating compromise.
That’s not fantasy. That’s relief.
Add subtle haptics, eye-hand coordination, and eventually neural or wrist-based feedback, and virtual interaction stops being a toy. It becomes practice. Skill transfer. Muscle memory without material cost.
This is the hidden fourth element — the one that quietly makes everything else worth it.
Why Step Back Now — And Does It Matter?
So why does it look like Meta is stepping back now?
Not because conviction vanished — but because pressure arrived too early. Public markets demand timelines. Narratives harden. “Too soon” starts to look like “too late.”
It’s also worth noting something structural: Meta is one of the last major tech companies still led by its original founder. That cuts both ways. Founder-led companies can think longer — but they also absorb pressure more personally. Adjustments are interpreted as retreat, even when they’re recalibration.
This story isn’t over.
Other players remain. Tim Cook has openly framed spatial computing as a long arc, not a quarterly one. Apple’s ecosystem already spans pocket, wrist, ears, and desk. Glasses would be a continuation, not a leap.
Microsoft seems content to enable rather than lead. Google watches, as always.
And the metaverse itself? It’s still on schedule.
It was never about VR.
It was never about cartoon avatars.
And it was never about leaving reality behind.
It was always about adding a quiet, trustworthy layer to the world we’re already in — one that respects space, reduces friction, and earns its place over time.
Watch this space.
We’re not done yet.
Share your thoughts